This type of argument is not new of course. Colin quotes Thomas Paine who said:
“A constitution is not the act of a government, but of a people constituting a government; and government without a constitution, is power without right”
Whilst Tom Paine was a 18th Century republican arguing against the divine right of monarchs rather than the authority of central government the comparison is still an interesting one. Why can't we apply the principles of Tom Paine to UK local government?
In this version of local democracy local citizens have the ability to determine the size and shape of their local political institution and to set up new ones if they are unhappy with the existing arrangements.
Crucially, local government is politically independent and this implies the need for a national constitution to protect this independence.
Colin Copus sums up his argument as follows:
"...a powerful alternative exists to current constitutional arrangements; an alternative resting on a sovereign and powerful citizenry, not sovereign political institutions. It is a model to which those calling themselves localists should give some thought as it provides a clear route by which localism can overturn the centralism inherent in a unitary state"
No comments:
Post a Comment